Land use
| We can only subdivide land once |
Land use is an important consideration for developing integrated
transport. Local governments can use the planning scheme and local
provisions to enable 'no build' transport solutions, reducing the
need for expensive infrastructure.
Travel and transport demand is a direct expression of land use.
People need to physically access the many facilities, services and
activities that make up our settlement patterns. Businesses also
need access for raw materials, labour, markets and distribution
systems.
Currently transport infrastructure responds to travel demands from
existing dispersed and low density land use patterns. Public transport
struggles to adequately service settlement patterns that generate
low patronage levels. Appropriate land use planning can redirect
travel demand, providing support for more sustainable modes, and
reducing car dependence.
|
Local governments have a significant influence over the
provision of infrastructure, mainly from their planning responsibilities,
particularly with respect to land use
(Infrastructure Planning Council, 2002)
|
Hence settlement patterns and the distribution of activities across
a region have profound implications for the transport system to
service the resultant travel demand.
Concepts of New Urbanism, Smart Growth and Transit Oriented Development
promote greater integration of land use planning with transport
access. These principles underpin Melbourne 2030 and are very relevant
to development throughout Victoria. The key message is that a significant
contribution for integrated, active and sustainable transport can
be made by a consolidated urban form of mixed use and accessible
destinations with built-in priority for walking, cycling and public
transport.
This is more sustainable than current practice, in which traditional
dispersed settlement patterns develop dependent upon long car trips.
These are very difficult to service by other transport means and
can confer significant disadvantage on the less mobile sections
of the community.
Integrated transport strategies aim for travel patterns that are
more sustainable, and
- Consume less resources
- Are safer and healthier
- Minimise environmental damage
Local governments can make good use of the planning scheme, zoning
system and development permits to achieve better outcomes for integrated
transport by undertaking the following;
- Structure planning to focus development in mixed-use activity
centres
- Consolidate development, by instituting urban growth boundaries
- Require destination mode planning with developer permits
- Establish developer contributions for all transport infrastructure
required by new developments
- Transit oriented urban design that prioritises sustainable modes
- Walking, cycling and public transport routes that are direct
and accessible without barriers to direct movement
- Minimisation of land occupation by transport infrastructure
Structure planning
to focus development in mixed-use activity centres
Local governments can review and adjust planning schemes to take
proactive measures to direct development with the ultimate aim of
establishing sustainable settlement patterns. For metropolitan local
governments these ideas are well supported by state directions in
Melbourne 2030.
|
Undertake detailed structure planning to set the strategic
framework for the use and development of land in and around
the (activity) centre and give clear direction to investors
about preferred locations for investment (Melbourne 2030,
Policy 1.1)
|
These principles are also applicable to regional centres and rural
situations faced with limited transport options throughout Victoria.
The set of performance criteria established for Melbourne 2030 activity
centre development is a tool to guide structure planning for sustainable
development.
Consolidate development
by instituting urban growth boundaries
Modes of walking, cycling and public transport can better serve
more compact urban areas, which can be facilitated by establishing
an urban growth boundary around existing settlement(s).
An urban growth boundary is a tool to better manage growth or development
by channelling activities into designated areas, and away from locations
where development may result in undesirable community outcomes,
including isolation from transport and connections.
An urban growth boundary has been established for metropolitan
Melbourne (Melbourne 2030, Policy 2.1). All local governments should
consider an urban growth boundary as a consolidation tool for more
sustainable settlement patterns. As well as concentrating growth
and protecting environmental assets, it can be used to focus development
in better serviced areas.
An urban growth boundary would help ensure that important community
facilities such as schools were located close to residential areas,
and help resist pressures for developments for less mobile groups,
such as retirement villages, in isolated circumstances.
Transit oriented urban design
that prioritises sustainable modes
An urban environment that can provide the best support for public
transport, walking and cycling needs to maximise the generation
of trips by these modes and minimise generation of car trips. This
can be achieved by orienting the urban environment to favour the
use of public transport, walking and cycling over the use of private
vehicles.
This is consistent with activity centre planning which aims to
maximise use of non-car modes by concentrating activities that generate
significant numbers of person trips in highly accessible locations.
Higher residential densities in the vicinity of public transport
stops and stations can generate more public transport trips and
sustain better service levels.
Urban design can influence user perception by designing an attractive
interface between the urban environment and public transport access
points. Ensuring that appropriate levels, materials, signs, lighting,
visibility and information are all in place will get maximum value
from proximity and combine utility and function with liveable features
and streetscape value.
Require destination mode
planning with development permits
Better links between destinations and public transport will encourage
public transport choices. Through requirements on permits for development,
local governments can require
- integrated travel plans for all site users
- trip end facilities for cyclists
- car parking limits (LINK to parking section)
Require developer contributions
for transport infrastructure from new developments
When land is developed it is likely that the use causes the need
for new or upgraded infrastructure. Development contributions are
payments or works-in-kind towards the provision of infrastructure
upgrades made by the proponent of a new development. Development
contributions can be provided through the:
- planning scheme amendment process
- planning permit process, or
- building permit process.
A recent review of development contributions established revised
guidelines for local governments to use developer contributions
to fund local infrastructure.
To levy developers for infrastructure contributions through the
planning or building permit process, a local government requires
a development contributions plan (DCP) which has been incorporated
into the local planning scheme.
A development contribution plan is the mechanism used to levy new
development for contributions to planned infrastructure needed by
the future community. It needs to be strategically justified and
clearly linked to future infrastructure expectations based on projected
population requirements.
In the work that local governments do, planning ahead for strategic
and service delivery for anticipated land use and activity demands,
provision of new infrastructure or upgrading existing facilities
to keep pace with ongoing development will be a constant task.
An integrated transport strategy that identifies the transport
infrastructure requirements of the future population can support
the development contribution plan and justify the financial component
from each development.
Walking and cycling routes
that are safe and accessible without barriers to direct movement
|
"We need to ensure that the most convenient, and
therefore the most used, transport mode is also the best for
the environment, community and economy" (Maribyrnong
ITS)
|
Geographical proximity does not mean easy, safe and direct access.
Local governments' control of local roads and negotiation position
with regards to arterial roads can influence access routes to favour
non motorized routes.
Useful tools are:
- Analysis of walking and cycling catchments using pedshed and
cycleshed techniques to identify and facilitate direct 'as the
crow flies' movements
- Travel demand management programs such as Safe Routes to Schools
and Walking School Bus can provide on-ground experience of the
walking and cycling trips to feed back to infrastructure managers
to inform expenditure. Local governments with in-house skills
for local area traffic management and community travel behaviour
have the facility to provide user experience to better inform
infrastructure design. (LINK to programs)
Minimisation of land
occupation by transport infrastructure
|